COVID close to home
“They didn’t know what to do with me,” Theresa Ball Meyers-Green said. “I was the first one.”
On March 24, 2020, Meyers-Green felt a little nauseous and dizzy. She has a perforated eardrum, and says that’s what normally happens when she gets a little water in it, so she tried to brush it off and get on with her day at the Walmart Vision Center. She works there as a part-time optician. She went home later, and went to bed that night like normal.
“And at two o'clock in the morning I woke up screaming,” she said.
She said she believed she was in sepsis, a body’s extreme reaction to infection. She had been through that with an illness several years before.
“Get me to the hospital” Meyers-Green told her husband. “I said ‘I'm in full blown sepsis, only it's worse this time because the pain is so much worse.’”
At the emergency room, Meyers-Green was given a swab test for the flu more than once, despite her insistence she was in sepsis.
“I really wasn’t friendly to them,” she admitted. “I was sure I knew what was going on.”
After doing bloodwork, they told her she was not in sepsis. At that point they brought her to the ICU and isolated her. Meyers-Green said while she experienced extreme body pains and the migraine symptom that has been associated with it, she didn’t have a fever.
“But I’m an oddball,” she said.
It took more than a day for them to get the pain under control. Meyers-Green was given oxygen, and breathing treatments, but wasn’t put on a ventilator. She did get pneumonia.
“I'll tell you what, it could have been so much worse,” she said. “I'm so thankful.”
She stayed at the hospital until Saturday morning, when they sent her home. She said she would have rather stayed at the hospital, given the choice.
“Sunday, the health department called me and said ‘You are positive’”, Meyers-Green said.
As rumors of the first positive case began to swirl through Houghton County, the health department issued letters to Meyers-Green and her family that they needed to stay on the premises of their property or they would be put into protective custody.
“Which meant we would be jailed,” Meyers-Green said. “And people were horrible.”
She said that people were watching her home and calling the health department, reporting that they had left the premises or had gone into stores, or spread the virus intentionally, none of which was true, she said.
Meyers-Green said she must have had contact with someone non-symptomatic who was shopping at Walmart. She had volunteered to pick up a shift covering the self-checks.
“And at that time, there was no masking,” Meyers-Green said. “They tried to trace me to the places that I had went, and that was the only place that would have been out of my norm.”
Almost 11 months from when she was infected, Meyers-Green says she’s still pretty far from feeling well.
“Oh yeah, no,” she said with an ironic laugh. “I don't have taste. I don't have smell. I have intestinal issues. I have breathing issues. There's days like today—I don't know if it's because I got the shot or what but I feel like a Mack truck hit me. I have cognitive problems…”
Feb. 15 is Meyers-Green’s 65th birthday, but she was able to get her first vaccine dose on Feb. 3, the day before our interview, because of her position as an optician.
She said since having COVID-19, she sometimes smells gasoline inexplicably. She said eating is an altogether different experience than it used to be.
“I can taste things that are extremely salty and really sweet,” Meyers-Green said. “But if I sat down to eat a pasty it would taste like garbage. I don't drink any caffeine but I love the smell of coffee. Now it's horrendous. It's horrible. Peanut butter’s horrible.”
She also had to change her perfume, toothpaste and shampoo, “Because my mind thinks it’s something else,” and her doctors have told her they don’t think her senses will change back to what they were.
Meyers-Green gets upset when people, including her own brothers, suggest what she caught was “just the flu”.
“…because I've had the flu and it's never put me in the hospital. It's never taken my smell and taste away. It's never given me pneumonia. It's never done any of this,” she said.
The virus has progressed differently for others in Houghton County, even people living close together.
“I retired due to different health conditions—I think March of last year—roughly a year ago,” said former 97th District Court Judge Mark Wisti.
He said his first COVID-19 symptom was just coughing, in mid-October of 2020.
“And my doctor ordered a test and I had COVID-19,” Wisti said.
It took a couple days for him to get results back. They didn’t do much contact tracing because both Wisti and his wife, Amy, were already isolating as strictly as possible.
“My immune system is very badly compromised to begin with,” Wisti said. “And we weren't going anywhere. I have to go to the hospital quite frequently.”
He speculates the hospital is where he was exposed. His wife also tested positive, but showed few symptoms.
Amy Wisti is a financial supporter of Late Edition.
“My symptoms were so minimal, I would not have gotten tested if Mark hadn't already tested positive,” Amy said.
She said it really worries her how many people might be carrying COVID-19 and spreading it while thinking they’re healthy, or only slightly sick.
“I had like a slight cough one day, and then I had a runny nose one day, and that was it,” she said. “If I had those symptoms and thought, ‘Oh, maybe I should be tested,’ I would have, you know, said to myself, ‘Amy, you're being ridiculous.’”
Likely due to his compromised immune system, Mark Wisti’s case was severe.
“Way severe,” he said. “I ended up being airlifted to the Mayo Clinic and spent a week down there.”
Wisti didn’t need to be put on a ventilator, but his blood oxygen level started dropping dramatically whenever he undertook any kind of activity, even just moving about. They put him on a heavy dose of oxygen and he entered intensive care for about a day before his airlift to the Mayo Clinic in Minnesota. He said they gave him “whatever Donald Trump got” and that he wasn’t really asking a lot of questions at the time because he was so sick.
“Yeah, Remdesivir,” he said. “And I got that and I probably got something else. But I really wasn't asking.”
Remdesivir was approved for treatment of RNA viruses including coronaviruses by the FDA in late October 2020. Previously it was only approved under an Emergency Use Authorization from May 1, 2020.
Wisti said he felt fine when they discharged him, except he had difficulty breathing.
“Which I guess is a big thing,” he said.
Wisti has undergone a double lung transplant, end-stage kidney disease, a kidney transplant, and numerous complications.
“So compared to what I’ve been through, it wasn’t that hard,” he said.
He’s still not recovered, though. His lung function, which was already as low as 87%, dipped to 61% and was at about 73% when we spoke in the first week of February.
“So it’s functional at that level but that’s still a—they don’t know if it’s going to come back or not,” Wisti said.
He said that because of his other conditions, the loss of lung function is more irritating than significantly impactful to his life. At 64, he hasn’t been able to get vaccinated yet, despite his medical condition.
Wisti said people making comments along the lines of ‘if you’re afraid of the virus, you can just stay home’ is offending to someone with his medical conditions.
“Someone like me, it’s almost at the point where you start feeling like you’re viewed as a second-class citizen,” he said.
He was already isolating himself, he said, and he’s prepared to continue that if that’s what is required to get through the pandemic. But the dismissal is insulting.
“There's ways of expressing that other than, you know, ‘Stay home, coward’, which is, you know, you hear that…,” he said.
The impacts of contracting COVID-19 aren’t constrained to a person’s own health, or even the people they live with, either.
“We ended up having to shut down for two weeks, because we didn’t know if anybody else had been exposed,” Donna Jarman, owner of the Mosquito Inn, said.
Three of her employees contracted COVID-19, and as a result, they were closed over Labor Day weekend in 2020. She said they were worried about all the employees.
“It was just scary, you know?” Jarman said. “Because to have three of our younger, healthier ones get it?”
Her and several other employees were tested and no more came back positive.
Jarman said the Mosquito Inn was following the rules with sanitizing and masking, and continues to do so, but losing out on Labor Day weekend business in the midst of a year where they’ve had to contend with limited or no seating is difficult. The Mosquito Inn, on M-26 outside of Toivola, depends heavily on ATV and snowmobile traffic. People riding the trail like to have somewhere inside to take a break and eat.
Jarman said that since some seating is now allowed, and that the area “actually got snow” the business has been doing comparatively well.
“But that’s normal,” she said. “This is normally our busiest time, right?”
Meyers-Green, who’s also back to work now, is really frustrated that some people continue to resist wearing masks in stores.
Many stores, including the local Walmart, still don’t insist on it from their customers, despite their corporate policy.
From Walmart’s corporate newsroom, dated Nov. 25, 2020
“I wear one for ten hours a day, and there’s days I can’t breathe and so I have to have my inhaler with me,” Meyers-Green said. “But they’re crying because they need to have a mask on for a half hour… I don’t know why they can’t just do this for somebody else.”
Many stores solicit customer comments, including Walmart. Below is a screenshot from their website.
The Houghton Walmart is store #2192.
EDIT: You can also report non-compliance on a variety of COVID-19 orders including for workplace safety, professional licensing, and even licensed health facilities directly to the Michigan Department of Health and Human Services at this website.
MTU Winter Carnival snow statue photos
I shared a lot of my snow statue photos earlier in the week. I went out on Wednesday, while the sun was still out. I think the snow and ice looks particularly nice in the sun, but the statues were not quite complete, either. I didn’t get the chance to head back out for more photos before the storm hit. I wonder what the statues look like half-buried in snow, though.
Here are a few from Wednesday that I didn’t share in my earlier email.
MTU put together this fun video with aerial shots recognizing all the winners that’s worth a quick watch, too.
TALES FROM LANSING: Interesting legislative action from the Michigan Capitol
I don’t spend a lot of time calling representatives and senators, but I do try to keep an eye on the legislation being moved through the House and Senate in Lansing. In the last few months and weeks, several bills and resolutions have come up that I think are worth mentioning.
Senate Concurrent Resolution 31 was introduced by our own Sen. Ed McBroom(R) last September, previous to our elections. In it, McBroom disagreed with two court cases and supported the “duly enacted election laws that ensure the integrity and efficient administration of our elections.”
A Trump-appointed district judge struck down as unenforceable provisions in law prohibiting the paid transportation of voters to the polls, and limiting who may assist and absentee voter with their ballot. A judge appointed by former Gov. Jennifer Granholm issued an injunction extending the ballot receipt deadline by 14 days.
McBroom asserted in his resolution that allowing these things creates opportunities for political groups to engage in quid-pro-quo crimes and increase fraud and “diminish public confidence in election results.”
An amendment was offered by Sen. Jeff Irwin(D), to commit to the selection of Electoral College electors that would faithfully vote in accordance with the certified Michigan vote. The amendment was unanimously adopted, although the resolution itself never left the Committee on Elections and Ethics for a vote in the House.
At the time of the Senate vote, which succeeded 22-14 along party lines, the Senate Journal quoted Sen. Jeremy Moss(D) as saying that while the resolution is “fine enough” when taken by itself, but not when considering the history of voter disenfranchisement being struck down by the courts, including literacy tests, poll taxes and wealth requirements.
“…I’m not comfortable making a statement that state election law is infallible, because sadly that flies in the face of voters and their struggle to affirm their enfranchisement in this country,” Moss said.
Sen. Stephanie Chang(D) pointed out that thousands of votes were not tallied in the August 2020 election because they were rejected for being received too late, and that the court order McBroom took exception to was a prudent step in avoiding that happening on election day the following November.
“Do you really want to deny them their voting rights?” she asked.
McBroom said the idea that he sought to disenfranchise voters was “so profoundly insulting and derogatory towards the maker of this resolution that it’s almost insufferable.”
He went on to explain that extending the time to collect mail-in ballots was a slippery slope, and unnecessary in light of a voter’s “enormous amount of time” already allowed to collect the ballot, decide who to vote for, and get it in the mail or drive it to the clerk’s office.
“I mean, come on,” the Senate Journal quotes him as saying. “Seriously, how much time do you need?”
Federal appeals courts with majority Republican-appointed judges later reinstated the laws in October. One dissenting judge argued the Republican Legislature should not have been able to intervene in the cases as they did.
Senate Concurrent Resolution 37 was also introduced by McBroom, on Dec. 18, 2021.
The first paragraph reads:
A concurrent resolution to call for a continued commitment to investigating allegations of fraud and irregularities in our election, to considering and implementing reforms to improve our elections and audit processes, and to restoring citizens’ faith in the accuracy and integrity of elections in Michigan.
The resolutions quotes an uptick in absentee voting, testimony from concerned citizens, county clerks, and poll challengers, and allegations of “fraud and irregularities, such as deceased persons voting, mismatched signatures on absentee ballots, error-prone voting equipment and other things” demand a thorough investigations.
He additionally called for prosecution of the “propagation of rumors designed to create mistrust and deceive the public”.
The rule to send the resolution to committee was suspended, and the resolution passed the Senate 21-16 along strict party lines.
Sen. Sylvia Santana(D) and others strongly opposed the resolution and her comments were recorded in the Senate Journal(page 81).
“…this resolution is not worth the paper it’s written on and truly is a waste of taxpayer’s resources,” she said, in part. “The real problem is not that there was fraud—it’s the lack of this body to take action and give our clerks the proper tools to perform their jobs.”
Santana pointed out that the opportunity to recount ballots was not exercised in 2020 “so I ask the question, why are you trying to play these shenanigans?”, and thanked Michigan clerks for their integrity before ending her statement.
McBroom responded that he was truly trying to ensure integrity and faith in elections. McBroom has corrected some false claims in hearings he presided over in his role as the chair of the Senate Oversight Committee. However, he also allowed hours of rehashed assertions about court-rejected and debunked allegations.
On Dec. 3, 2020, McBroom was part of a group of senators that introduced Senate Bill 1253. This bill, had it not been vetoed, would have limited the epidemic orders from the Department of Health and Human Services to 28 days without extensions from the legislature.
Democrats in the House and Senate both tried introducing amendments that would have weakened the bill, but the amendments failed each time. The bill passed the Senate 22-16 along party lines, and passed the House 59-44, with mostly Republican support, but some Democrats, including Rep. Sara Cambensy(D), who represents the Marquette area.
Gov. Gretchen Whitmer vetoed the bill on Dec. 30.
Cambensy has recently crossed the aisle to support several other Republican sponsored bills as well. Notably House Bills 4047 and 4048.
These bills surround coronavirus relief, primarily. HB 4047 appropriates $393.5 million in state tax dollars to give breaks to business impacted by lockdowns including restaurants and bars, exercise and recreation facilities and entertainment venues.
It passed the House on Feb. 4 with mostly Republican support, 60-49, and has been sent to the Senate.
Cambensy voted in favor of HB 4048, but not 4049, which it is tie-barred to. This means they can only be enacted together.
HB 4048 allocates the $1.8 billion in federal aid to schools. It passed the House 58-52.
HB 4049 strips the MDHHS director of the authority to close schools or restrict school sporting events, and give the authority to local health departments instead. It passed the house 57-52, with no Democrats in support, and a single Republican joining them in opposition.
House Republicans have also passed House Bill 4019, which will appropriate about a quarter of the new federal relief money.
House Democrats have introduced their own federal coronavirus relief money approprations bill in House Bill 4039, which would immediately authorize $3.661 billion in federal aid for unemployment payments and vaccine distribution, as well as millions in state spending to bolster other aid, including for businesses. It was referred to the House Appropriations committee, and was motioned to be discharged from that committee for a vote by Rep. Yousef Rabhi(D) on Feb. 4.
A large group of Democrats recently proposed House Bill 4023, which would expand gun-free zones to include all buildings owned or leased by the state of Michigan. The bill has been referred to the House Committee on Government Operations, chaired by Mike Mueller(R).
A few Democrats in the Senate also proposed Senate Bill 34 and 35. SB 34 prohibits the possession of a firearm on the premises of the state capitol. SB 35 only prohibits concealed firearms. Both bills were forwarded to the Committee on Government Operations without seeing a vote.
On the other side of the aisle, Rep. Gary Eisen has introduced a suite of bills to reduce prohibitions of firearms.
House Bills 4010, 4011 and 4012 reduce the penalties for the first offense of carrying a pistol into a gun-free zone, particularly for a qualified concealed pistol instructor. None of the bills has received a vote.
Perhaps Eisen’s most disturbing bill is House Bill 4006, which would exempt elected officials from gun-free zone restrictions, and the exemption would remain for a year after leaving office. This bill has been referred to the Committee on the Judiciary and hasn’t received a vote.
Tales from Lansing
Interesting legislative action from the Michigan Capitol-
I don’t spend a lot of time calling representatives and senators, but I do try to keep an eye on the legislation being moved through the House and Senate in Lansing. In the last few months and weeks, several bills and resolutions have come up that I think are worth mentioning.
Senate Concurrent Resolution 31 was introduced by our own Sen. Ed McBroom(R) last September, previous to our elections. In it, McBroom disagreed with two court cases and supported the “duly enacted election laws that ensure the integrity and efficient administration of our elections.”
A Trump-appointed district judge struck down as unenforceable provisions in law prohibiting the paid transportation of voters to the polls, and limiting who may assist and absentee voter with their ballot. A judge appointed by former Gov. Jennifer Granholm issued an injunction extending the ballot receipt deadline by 14 days.
McBroom asserted in his resolution that allowing these things creates opportunities for political groups to engage in quid-pro-quo crimes and increase fraud and “diminish public confidence in election results.”
An amendment was offered by Sen. Jeff Irwin(D), to commit to the selection of Electoral College electors that would faithfully vote in accordance with the certified Michigan vote. The amendment was unanimously adopted, although the resolution itself never left the Committee on Elections and Ethics for a vote in the House.
At the time of the Senate vote, which succeeded 22-14 along party lines, the Senate Journal quoted Sen. Jeremy Moss(D) as saying that while the resolution is “fine enough” when taken by itself, but not when considering the history of voter disenfranchisement being struck down by the courts, including literacy tests, poll taxes and wealth requirements.
“…I’m not comfortable making a statement that state election law is infallible, because sadly that flies in the face of voters and their struggle to affirm their enfranchisement in this country,” Moss said.
Sen. Stephanie Chang(D) pointed out that thousands of votes were not tallied in the August 2020 election because they were rejected for being received too late, and that the court order McBroom took exception to was a prudent step in avoiding that happening on election day the following November.
“Do you really want to deny them their voting rights?” she asked.
McBroom said the idea that he sought to disenfranchise voters was “so profoundly insulting and derogatory towards the maker of this resolution that it’s almost insufferable.”
He went on to explain that extending the time to collect mail-in ballots was a slippery slope, and unnecessary in light of a voter’s “enormous amount of time” already allowed to collect the ballot, decide who to vote for, and get it in the mail or drive it to the clerk’s office.
“I mean, come on,” the Senate Journal quotes him as saying. “Seriously, how much time do you need?”
Federal appeals courts with majority Republican-appointed judges later reinstated the laws in October. One dissenting judge argued the Republican Legislature should not have been able to intervene in the cases as they did.
Senate Concurrent Resolution 37 was also introduced by McBroom, on Dec. 18, 2021.
The first paragraph reads:
A concurrent resolution to call for a continued commitment to investigating allegations of fraud and irregularities in our election, to considering and implementing reforms to improve our elections and audit processes, and to restoring citizens’ faith in the accuracy and integrity of elections in Michigan.
The resolutions quotes an uptick in absentee voting, testimony from concerned citizens, county clerks, and poll challengers, and allegations of “fraud and irregularities, such as deceased persons voting, mismatched signatures on absentee ballots, error-prone voting equipment and other things” demand a thorough investigations.
He additionally called for prosecution of the “propagation of rumors designed to create mistrust and deceive the public”.
The rule to send the resolution to committee was suspended, and the resolution passed the Senate 21-16 along strict party lines.
Sen. Sylvia Santana(D) and others strongly opposed the resolution and her comments were recorded in the Senate Journal(page 81).
“…this resolution is not worth the paper it’s written on and truly is a waste of taxpayer’s resources,” she said, in part. “The real problem is not that there was fraud—it’s the lack of this body to take action and give our clerks the proper tools to perform their jobs.”
Santana pointed out that the opportunity to recount ballots was not exercised in 2020 “so I ask the question, why are you trying to play these shenanigans?”, and thanked Michigan clerks for their integrity before ending her statement.
McBroom responded that he was truly trying to ensure integrity and faith in elections. McBroom has corrected some false claims in hearings he presided over in his role as the chair of the Senate Oversight Committee. However, he also allowed hours of rehashed assertions about court-rejected and debunked allegations.
On Dec. 3, 2020, McBroom was part of a group of senators that introduced Senate Bill 1253. This bill, had it not been vetoed, would have limited the epidemic orders from the Department of Health and Human Services to 28 days without extensions from the legislature.
Democrats in the House and Senate both tried introducing amendments that would have weakened the bill, but the amendments failed each time. The bill passed the Senate 22-16 along party lines, and passed the House 59-44, with mostly Republican support, but some Democrats, including Rep. Sara Cambensy(D), who represents the Marquette area.
Gov. Gretchen Whitmer vetoed the bill on Dec. 30.
Cambensy has recently crossed the aisle to support several other Republican sponsored bills as well. Notably House Bills 4047 and 4048.
These bills surround coronavirus relief, primarily. HB 4047 appropriates $393.5 million in state tax dollars to give breaks to business impacted by lockdowns including restaurants and bars, exercise and recreation facilities and entertainment venues.
It passed the House on Feb. 4 with mostly Republican support, 60-49, and has been sent to the Senate.
Cambensy voted in favor of HB 4048, but not 4049, which it is tie-barred to. This means they can only be enacted together.
HB 4048 allocates the $1.8 billion in federal aid to schools. It passed the House 58-52.
HB 4049 strips the MDHHS director of the authority to close schools or restrict school sporting events, and give the authority to local health departments instead. It passed the house 57-52, with no Democrats in support, and a single Republican joining them in opposition.
House Republicans have also passed House Bill 4019, which will appropriate about a quarter of the new federal relief money.
House Democrats have introduced their own federal coronavirus relief money approprations bill in House Bill 4039, which would immediately authorize $3.661 billion in federal aid for unemployment payments and vaccine distribution, as well as millions in state spending to bolster other aid, including for businesses. It was referred to the House Appropriations committee, and was motioned to be discharged from that committee for a vote by Rep. Yousef Rabhi(D) on Feb. 4.
A large group of Democrats recently proposed House Bill 4023, which would expand gun-free zones to include all buildings owned or leased by the state of Michigan. The bill has been referred to the House Committee on Government Operations, chaired by Mike Mueller(R).
A few Democrats in the Senate also proposed Senate Bill 34 and 35. SB 34 prohibits the possession of a firearm on the premises of the state capitol. SB 35 only prohibits concealed firearms. Both bills were forwarded to the Committee on Government Operations without seeing a vote.
On the other side of the aisle, Rep. Gary Eisen has introduced a suite of bills to reduce prohibitions of firearms.
House Bills 4010, 4011 and 4012 reduce the penalties for the first offense of carrying a pistol into a gun-free zone, particularly for a qualified concealed pistol instructor. None of the bills has received a vote.
Perhaps Eisen’s most disturbing bill is House Bill 4006, which would exempt elected officials from gun-free zone restrictions, and the exemption would remain for a year after leaving office. This bill has been referred to the Committee on the Judiciary and hasn’t received a vote.
Open Meetings Act violation in Houghton County
Here’s the recording of the Jan. 29 meeting of the Houghton County Board with Senator Ed McBroom and Representative Greg Markkanen. (The transcript is automatically generated and FAR from 100% correct, but serves as a way of finding what you want to listen to more easily, like an index for the recording.)
In attendance were Al Koskela, Tom Tikkanen, Gretchen Jannsen, Glenn Anderson, and Roy Britz, all five commissioners.
While no quorum was called, it doesn’t need to be for this to have been considered a public meeting.
Page one of the Open Meetings Act. A quorum was present, according to the recording, in which each of the commissioners introduces themselves.
Robert’s Rules of Order, which many legislative bodies use to conduct business in an orderly manner—despite potential controversy among the members—is not part of Michigan law. Those rules are adopted voluntarily by the legislative body. Not calling a quorum under Robert’s Rules doesn’t mean one doesn’t exist under law, or exempt the body from following the Open Meetings Act.
While the county commissioners did not make any decision, they certainly spoke on matters of recent resolutions. The meeting lasted an hour and fifteen minutes and the agenda covered items from DNR funding for the trail system to reopening ice rinks and bars.
Page two. And the county board is not listed in the exceptions in sections 7 and 8.
The Open Meetings Act requires public comment be allowed under these circumstances, but there was none asked for.
Senator McBroom and Representative Markkanen said they had other appointments, and the Zoom video call was ended.
But those in attendance probably saw that coming, based on the agenda-
McBroom and Markkanen, not being part of the public body in question, were free to reach their next appointments. But under the Open Meetings Act, the commissioners should have stayed to take comment.
And none of this even gets into the problematic way that public notice of Friday’s meeting was given.
Violating the Open Meetings act is a misdemeanor, punishable by a fine up to $1,000.
Page seven. If members of the board of commissioners want to avoid those fines, they should become more familiar with the Open Meetings Act now.
COVID-19 Vaccines—The how and why
“Didn’t even feel the needle going in, and I thought I’d feel it because it looks like six inches long,” Joseph Enrietti, 95, said.
Enrietti, a resident of Ahmeek, got his first COVID-19 vaccine shot through the Hancock Veterans Affairs Office in mid-January. He’s scheduled for his second dose next week.
“A little sore if you touched it the next day, but if you didn’t touch it, didn’t know I had it,” he said.
He said the VA called him, and he was the second person to get the vaccine there, after a 97-year-old. He said he recommends the shot to anyone who can get it. He said his family in Marquette can’t get an appointment.
Unfortunately, Pfizer’s CEO Albert Bourla has said COVID-19 is likely here to stay in an interview with Bloomberg this week. New, emerging variants before the vaccine was distributed mean that new vaccines will be needed to be in continual development.
“But also it looks like we have the tools to make Covid like the flu,” he told John Micklethwait. “That means it will not disturb our lives or the economy. We just need to be very vigilant about [tracking new] strains. And we need to be very vigilant about vaccinating people.”
But in Copper Country, those vaccination efforts have now slowed to a crawl. Plans for vaccine distribution have changed several times, and the vaccine supply isn’t increasing, according to Kate Beer—MPA, CFPH, CPA and CGMA.
Two of those designations are certifications in public accounting, MPA is a master’s in public administration, and the CFPH is a certificate in the foundations of public health. She’s worked in different roles in Upper Peninsula health for more than 25 years, and has been the Western Upper Peninsula Health Department’s administrator since October 2014.
“So, for example, this week we got in about 1,000 doses,” Beer said. “And 750 of those doses were second doses.”
That means only 250 more people in WUPHD’s 5-county jurisdiction can receive their first vaccine shot this week, but if the second doses aren’t delivered, the first doses will be wasted.
“We’re hopeful that this next round, we might get a little bit more, because they’re almost done with the long term care facilities,” Beer said.
But the state could decide to allocate those spare doses somewhere else, too.
Beer said the state has changed their allocation strategy several times in response to the supply they’ve been receiving from the federal level. Right now, she said WUPHD doesn’t know how many doses the district will be getting from week to week, which makes scheduling and keeping appointments difficult. Beer said some care providers have had to cancel vaccination clinics because they didn’t get the vaccine they had planned on having.
She also said that care providers are working very hard to verify appointments, because many people are signing up on more than one providers vaccination list.
“We're going to run into where people just aren't going to show up for an appointment slot, because they got it somewhere else,” she said. “And that's, that's what's gonna, you know, kind of gum up the system.”
She asked that people only sign up for one list, or take their names off duplicate lists. That will help make sure no vaccine is wasted in our area.
Tight scheduling is crucial in making sure each dose is responsibly used, too. Each vial of the Moderna vaccine contains six doses of vaccine, but can’t be transported and expires within six hours of opening. If you have six bottles of vaccine, you want to be sure to have 36 arms ready for a shot in that time.
“We've actually had a few no-shows,” Beer said. “So we've had to, you know, we've kind of kept a list of people we can call on.”
This list mainly consists of people previously eligible who missed or turned down their first chance at a shot, or others eligible who might be able to travel to the vaccination site on short notice. Beer said she isn’t front-line essential and has not had her first shot.
Individuals will mostly get their vaccine shots from their regular care provider, but WUPHD has been running vaccine clinics for school staff, first responders, and other smaller, eligible groups. WUPHD advocates for local care providers with the state. For instance, the Pfizer vaccine has to be kept very cold, and in rural areas refridgeration of that level is not readily available. Pelleted dry ice can be used to achieve those temperatures in many areas.
“In the Western U.P., we really don’t have a source for dry ice that does it in the pellet form that’s required,” Beer said.
So most of the vaccines sent here are from Moderna.
“Vaccine hesitancy”, or resistance to taking the vaccine, hasn’t been too much of a problem, but isn’t uncommon, either. Beer said that the goal is at least 70% of the population taking the vaccine, but some groups they’ve scheduled with have had as low as 50% acceptance. She said a lot of people are coming around as distribution continues, though.
“I think there's a lot of, of mistrust around the safety of the vaccine, because nobody's been upfront to say, ‘Hey, we did actually do all the studies that would normally be done, we just did it in a way that compressed the timeline,’” said Dr. Kelly Kamm.
Kamm has a doctorate in epidemiology from the State University of New York at Buffalo, and a master’s degree in microbiology from John Hopkins School of Hygiene and Public Health. She works as assistant professor of kinesiology and integrative physiology at Michigan Technological University. Among her research foci are rural health, hand hygiene, and the social determinants of health.
Johns Hopkins University of Medicine has put together a really great interactive explanation of the accelerated trials process the vaccine went through. I highly recommend checking it out, because I’m not going to try to duplicate it.
A screenshot captured from coronavirus.jhu.edu/vaccines/timeline
A short explanation of the timeline acceleration is that trials are normally done one after another, but in the compressed timeline, they overlapped the phases, and started preparing for the manufacturing process under the assumption it would be successful.
COVID-19 vaccine research wasn’t slowed down much by an ethical issue that slows down other medical research. A “challenge trial” is when a placebo is given to half the participants instead of the preventative being tested, and then all participants are exposed to the disease. Those that catch the disease are then treated.
“You can only do those kinds of studies with things that we can treat, it's completely unethical to do it with a disease that we have no treatment for,” Kamm said.
With no proven treatment for COVID-19, once the trial participants are given a vaccine, researchers have to wait for enough of them to be naturally exposed to do mathematical comparisons.
“You pick a population to run your trial and of people who are already at high risk, because they're going to be more likely to be exposed. And unfortunately, some of them will develop the disease,” Kamm said. “COVID—we have lots of people who are at high risk.”
She said allergic reactions that have been observed since the vaccination of the public began are not a sign that the testing wasn’t thorough, or that the vaccine is unsafe.
“If you have a reaction that occurs, one in a million people—you don't do the phase three trial in a million people,” Kamm said. “So you wouldn't see that reaction until you release it into the public.”
Beer said a handful of reactions have been caught during the vaccination process in the Western U.P.. Providers have been keeping patients under observation for at least fifteen minutes to monitor for a reaction, and keep medication on hand to treat the anaphylactic shock that has been observed.
“And, and we see that with flu too. So you know, even with flu, if you've not had a flu shot before, or you've had any kind of reaction, they won't let you just get the shot and go, they make you sit there,” Kamm said.
Kamm said the idea of herd immunity without vaccines is an impossibility.
“Herd immunity is in terms of vaccines,” she said. “I mean, we really don't talk about it as a public health methodology of letting the disease rampage through the population to develop herd immunity.”
She said trying to do so puts a lot of people at risk of long-term impacts, even if they don’t die.
“And I think we have to remember, we don't know the long term impacts,” Kamm said.
Strokes, long-term breathing trouble, heart weakness and cognitive difficulties have all been reported by people who have ‘recovered’ from COVID-19.
“If you had an infection that led to that, you know, that led to all sorts of systemic inflammation—We don't know if 20 years from now, that's going to be a contributing factor to cardiovascular disease, we have no idea,” Kamm said.
The well-known initial symptom of loss of smell and taste has also been reported to be long-lasting to some.
“The quality of life impact on that is, you know, it's not something to to dismiss lightly,” Kamm said.
She said even those people who initially only showed mild symptoms could have long-term effect that might impact quality or length of life.
Beyond that, Beer said that research is starting to show a person’s immunity after having COVID-19 seems to only last between 90 days and 5 months at the most, which means a person can re-catch COVID-19 several times a year, new variants or not.
“And so this idea to ‘just let it rip’ is, is very problematic in my opinion,” Kamm said.
WUPHD’s role in launching ‘non-pharmaceutical interventions’ in Copper Country
Before 2020, the Western Upper Peninsula Health Department wasn’t focused on surveilling and testing for highly-contagious viruses like COVID-19.
“I mean, those are definitely missions of the health department,” said Tanya Rule, WUPHD’s director of environmental health, who works out of the Hancock Office. “But this is a whole new disease we’re dealing with, and obviously nobody working here has ever dealt with a pandemic before.”
For almost a year now, many of their normal duties have been pushed to corners of the day while the bulk of Rule’s five local employees’ time is spent on COVID-19-related activity.
Rule’s environmental health department was mostly focused on well and septic permitting, system inspections, and building permits. Many other inspections, like for swimming pools, campgrounds, and tattoo parlors, are also done by contract with the state of Michigan. The health department also responds to emergencies like the 2018 Father’s Day flood, toxic spills, and does educational outreach for things like Lyme disease and radon.
Going into 2020, Rule had planned to be spending time outside of those regular duties digitizing her department’s records, speeding up E.coli testing at beaches, and updating the local sanitary code.
Paper records made response to the 2018 Father’s Day Flood more difficult as they were trying to figure out what water supplies and septic systems might be compromised. Rule said they purchased specialized software in 2019 to be able to lay those records out on a map.
“And so we are working on inputting all of our data into that, so it can be used for public health purposes and also just be accessible to the public,” Rule said. “Because people ask us for data all the time.”
The sanitary code revision has been a four-year project, all but halted due to COVID-19.
“The only local code that we have here is our Superior Environmental Health Code that regulates on-site septic systems,” Rule said. “Every other code that we regulate the public under is a state code.”
Other health department plans to expand healthy eating, asthma prevention, marijuana education, and substance abuse programs were all put on hold. Instead, they’ve been making sure the necessary things, like construction and operating permits, are taken care of while putting focus on the COVID-19 response.
When the first COVID-19 shutdown happened early in 2020, WUPHD’s staff was working to learn as much as they could and create website content and documents to share with the public and with schools and businesses to educate them on compliance and safety.
“Starting in March, my staff conducted 742 field visits at local businesses in our five counties,” Rule said. “These were not regulatory visits.”
Rule said they visited schools, restaurants, bars, grocery stores, hardware stores, campgrounds, pools—any public place—and brought information about COVID-19 safety and prevention.
Since there were not any safe drugs or vaccines available, education focused on ‘non-pharmaceutical interventions’, or NPIs.
Dr. Kelly Kamm has a doctorate in epidemiology from the State University of New York at Buffalo, and a master’s degree in microbiology from John Hopkins School of Hygiene and Public Health. She works as assistant professor of kinesiology and integrative physiology at Michigan Technological University. Among her research foci are rural health, hand hygiene, and the social determinants of health.
Kamm said that treating a sick person with an antiviral or antimicrobial pharmaceutical is a great way to keep them from infecting other people by shortening the amount of time they have the disease and are infectious. However, there’s currently no known safe treatment for COVID-19, so NPIs are necessary instead.
“So those are the things like hand washing, the social distancing—it’s all these behavioral things that we can do—wearing a mask, keeping ourselves healthy through other ways…” Kamm said. “Those are what we consider those non-pharmaceutical interventions.”
Kamm said Copper Country may have been spared early infection simply because there weren’t many people coming into the area at the time. Students weren’t returning from other areas, and there are no major airports like those in big American cities that saw many of the early outbreaks.
“So rural areas in that case were protected a bit,” Kamm said. “The problem becomes—in terms of safety—that rural areas are very underserved in terms of healthcare.”
Urban areas like Detroit, Grand Rapids, Milwaukee and Chicago have multiple hospitals in close proximity, so it doesn’t take long to get transferred from an overcrowded hospital to one with spare capacity. The hospitals of the Upper Peninsula are much more distant from each other, smaller, and have less of a labor pool to draw from.
“Our job market for anything is just much tighter and harder to fill in if people are out,” Kamm said. “If you want to have visiting nurses, where are they going to come from?”
Kamm said normally there are benefits to living in a smaller, close-knit community, too. During the Father’s Day floods, people came out immediately to help each other, because they know that other help is distant and could take a long time reaching them.
“I think with COVID, the problem is really that people aren’t recognizing this as a community issue that we need to address as a community,” Kamm said.
Once positive cases started appearing in their jurisdiction, the WUPHD staff switched to phone calls to ensure they didn’t catch or spread COVID-19. Rule said they made nearly 550 calls, focused on places like nursing homes, hotels, daycare centers, and private medical practitioners. Two health educators who manned the emergency call system at WUPHD, activated for COVID-19 response, were taking upwards of 100 calls per day through the summer, she said. One of her staff assisted them.
Contact tracers were overwhelmed with the number of calls they needed to make in early November, and prioritized those either more susceptible to the disease, or those more likely to transmit it because they were in a congregate situation like a nursing home or school. However, that doesn’t mean others were left abandoned, Rule said. They still got notified and are asked to quarantine and notify their own close contacts, but aren’t interviewed about potential contacts by WUPHD staff.
Rule said that while there are some people who don’t cooperate with the health department’s contact tracing, most of the community is very cooperative.
“People are honest about where they’ve been and who they’ve been in contact with because they want to protect their communities just as much as the next person,” Rule said.
Schools are a big part of the contact tracing and intervention efforts. WUPHD has 20 schools in its jurisdiction.
“And, since the pandemic began… we’ve had to quarantine just over 3,000 students and staff in our 20 school districts,” Rule said.
Someone from WUPHD is in contact with each district every day to discuss exposures, tests and quarantines, with the goal of keeping the schools open.
“Quick identification of a positive, and then getting their close contacts into quarantine and doing virtual school is really a way of preventing the closure of the entire school,” Rule said. “And we have found that to be effective.”
During the past year, WUPHD has also helped greatly expand testing capacity in the area, and offered rapid COVID-19 testing to all the emergency services, schools and other critical infrastructure employees.
“We want to make sure that our emergency services are maintained, and that they don't have an outbreak because we know that our first responder groups are very small,” Rule said. “We don't have the capacity for all the firemen or all the police officers in one agency to, you know, be part of an outbreak.”
Rule said the new testing lab at Michigan Technological University made a huge difference, cutting the wait time for lab results from 1-2 weeks to 1-3 days.
“When we were really backlogged and delayed of[sic] testing,” Rule said. “Sometimes by the time we would get the results, the person's quarantine would be over. So that became problematic with preventing spread.”
The lab was expanded with help from a grant WUPHD received from the Michigan Department of Environment, Great Lakes, and Energy. The grant also supported the wastewater testing pilot, which showed community outbreaks can be predicted in communities as small as MTU dormitories by detecting the increase of virus pieces in wastewater stream samples.
Rule said that 519 businesses in WUPHD’s five-county jurisdiction have been contacted about having a customer or employee test positive during the pandemic.
“So then they are obligated to notify their staff that they had an exposure so that they can further monitor themselves for symptoms,” Rule said.
A handful of exposure sites have been released to the public, but Rule said WUPHD tries to avoid doing that if they can. They release statements in cases where people were likely ignorant to their exposure, and unable to be contacted.
“If we have a way of knowing who was exposed, then there were definitely situations where we didn’t need to do a press release,” Rule said. “We would only need to notify the people who are at risk.”
Once COVID-19 became community-wide, she says the exposure notifications also became unnecessary. Everywhere became a potential exposure site.
“We were really then relying on everyone to do their part by masking, minimizing your exposure to the community, staying home when you’re sick, etcetera,” Rule said.
Rule also helped people develop COVID-19 safety plans for people’s organizations and events who wanted to be sure they were in compliance with the orders at the time.
She said that the small percentage of their time that has garnered the most attention has been consumer complaint investigations.
“We didn’t go out and do any surveillance as far as enforcement activity,” Rule said. “We simply just responded to individual consumer complaints.”
Kamm said that nobody interested public health would desire the shutdown of an economy.
“Poverty is one of the biggest risk factors for poor health,” she said. “But we also don’t want people needlessly dying.”
Kamm said it shouldn’t have to be one or the other, either. If NPIs are used in a way that is effective, no parts of the economy should need to be closed.
“If we can keep this under control, then they’d have more ability to be able to open things up,” she said.
WUPHD’s contract with MDHHS binds them to respond to consumer complaints against facilities they regulate.
“So, if a member of the public files a complaint against a restaurant, a bar, a swimming pool, campground, a body or establishment—or if it’s about a septic discharge or a contaminated water supply—we always respond to those complaints,” Rule said. “And we have to respond within five days per our contract.”
Rule said WUPHD regulated 427 food service establishments in 2020. Since March, they’ve received 492 COVID-19-related consumer complaints against 60 restaurants and bars.
She said on the first complaint, they would simply make a phone call. Often the establishment was just unaware of the current rule.
“The rules changed—like everyone has been frustrated with—sometimes weekly, every other week,” Rule said.
Rule said only four establishments through 2020 did not voluntarily comply with regulations after being called. After that point, the businesses were referred to the Department of Agriculture and Rural Development, who followed up with enforcement action, starting with a cease and desist order. Three businesses have been fined, one business had their liquor license temporarily suspended, and one facility has had their food service license suspended and continues legal action and appeal.
Asked a series of questions, including why restaurants and bars seem to be most heavily impacted, Michigan Department of Health and Human Services public information officer Bob Wheaton replied with this written statement:
COVID-19 spreads in indoor settings where individuals socialize without masks. When the order was first issued in November, there were 54 known outbreaks associated with bars and restaurants in Michigan. Because about 50 to 60 percent of all COVID-19 cases cannot be tied to a known source of infection, and because tying cases to places where individuals may spend only an hour is difficult, there is an unknown number of further outbreaks not counted in that total. Targeted and temporary closures that include restaurants have been part of successful strategies for containing COVID surges in Western Europe. Other states are now following this approach, and it is supported by leading public health experts nationwide. The department hopes that residents will do the right thing and follow these orders to save lives and protect their family, friends and community from further spread of COVID-19.
Wheaton also shared links to some studies:
This study, published by Nature on Nov. 10, uses mobility data to show that limiting maximum capacity inside “points of interest” like restaurants is more effective at limiting spread than uniformly reducing mobility (total shutdowns).
This article from Bloomberg, based on a Stanford study, highlights similar findings.
This study from the Centers for Disease Control that found, “Adults with positive SARS-CoV-2 test results were approximately twice as likely to have reported dining at restaurants than were those with negative SARS-CoV-2 test results.”
CNBC reported on analyzed credit card data that showed in-person restaurant spending was “particularly predictive” of a rise in new infections three weeks later.
This study, from the Journal of Korean Medical Science, found that under some conditions, SARS-CoV-2 could be transmitted to people as far as 6.5 meters away. That’s more than 20 feet.
MDHHS personnel did not grant me an interview.
Kamm said there are two kinds of “barriers” that keep people from using NPIs to prevent disease, structural barriers and psychosocial barriers.
Structural barriers can be something like the availability of a sink to wash your hands.
“We address that by having hand sanitizer all over the place,” Kamm said. “And that reduces that barrier so it’s convenient for you.”
However, she said in the Upper Peninsula’s climate, hand sanitizer dries out the hands and that can itself become a barrier that needs to be overcome. Some companies are trying to address it with better hand sanitizers that don’t dry out the hands.
Psychosocial barriers are more about feelings and habits.
“If it’s not your habit to wash your hands when you come home from going to the grocery store, it’s hard to learn that new habit,” Kamm said.
Developing new habits can be hard, and even harder when everything else in life is also pushing new stress on us, according to Kamm.
“Any behavior change, even something where we think that it should be easy to do, and it's something everybody knows they should do—It's not as simple as that,” she said. “We know in health behavior that just educating someone doesn’t work.”
She said part of this is just changing social norms. People push back initially but it eventually becomes normal, like when seatbelt use was mandated.
“And there’s always a bumpy road on doing that,” Kamm said.
Kamm said behavior change surrounding the HIV epidemic is a pretty good comparison. After being educated, each individual had to make their own risk-benefit analysis for themselves before deciding whether to change their behavior in any way.
“And when we look at those groups that were more likely to be okay with those behavior changes, those were the groups that saw all of their friends dying, that saw for themselves the horrible impact of HIV-AIDS,” Kamm said. “And we see the same thing in any disease.”
She said most people probably don’t know someone who has died of COVID-19, so that risk-benefit analysis hasn’t hit a tipping point for many. Particularly because those deaths are not evenly distributed in the population. This complicates getting across the message that NPI behavior protects everyone, not just yourself.